Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Outstanding synthesis of nutritional neuroscience literature. Your decision to transparently address the MIND diet RCT's null result while contextualizing it within the broader observational and mechanistic evidence is intellectually honest in a way most health writing avoids.

The tau phosphorylation mechanism you describe for sugar-induced cognitive decline is particularly compelling. What's underappreciated is how this creates a feed-forward loop: brain insulin resistance impairs glucose utilization, which then drives compensatory hyperglycemia, exacerbating the original insulin resistance. It's metabolically similar to peripheral insulin resistance but with profoundly different consequences given neurons' limited regenerative capacity.

One nuance on the ultra-processed food findings: the AGE/ALE formation pathway you mention is temperature and time-dependent. Home cooking at moderate temperatures generates far fewer of these compounds compared to industrial processing. This suggests that the processing method matters as much as the ingredient list which has implications for the "five ingredient rule" heuristic you propose.

Your framing of dietary choices as a "cognitive investment portfolio" is rhetorically effective. The time-delay between dietary patterns and cognitive outcomes makes cause-effect invisible to most people. By the time clinical symptoms appear, decades of cumulative damage have occurred. The plasticity evidence you cite is encouraging, but probably requires sustained adherence measured in years, not weeks.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?